31May

This one is a bit of a heavy thought experiment I've been thinking about for some time now. I've used the Lorentz factor to work out the time dilation difference in seconds for certain speeds. I first started out asking what effect time dilation has when we travel by airplane or if we live on the equator, but it quickly grew from there ...

**Time Dilation at the Earth's equator:**

Living on the equator means that due to the Earths spin you get an additional 465.1 m/s of velocity vs sitting on the pole (This does not take into account any wobble on the Earth's axis). Compared to anyone sitting at the poles you would be 0.00004 seconds younger for each year that passes.

Over a 100 year life time: 4 milliseconds

**Passenger Aircraft:**

Flying in a plane can get you speeds of up to 917 m/s when in one of the latest Boeing 747s. Unfortunately that speed is not constant as it takes time to take off and get to the cruising speed. At 917 m/s if you cruise for 10 hours, you would be 0.168 microseconds younger than if you stayed on the ground. If you somehow managed to get a plane to fly non stop (refuel in the air?) then over a 1 year period you would be 0.0001475 seconds younger compared to if you were left on the ground.

Over a 100 year life time: 14.75 milliseconds

If we also take into account that you are flying east around the equator then we get 917 m/s from the plane and 465.1 m/s of velocity from the rotating Earth. At 1382.1 m/s you would gain 0.000335133072 seconds vs you sitting at one of the poles.

Over a 100 year life time: 33.51 milliseconds

**Live on The International Space Station:**

The ISS orbits the earth at 7706.6 m/s relative to the Earth's center. If you had the money (or some serious negotiating skills) and managed to live on board the ISS each year you would be 0.0104198349888 seconds younger than if you had stayed on the north pole.

Over a 100 year life time: 1.04 seconds

**Live on Mercury:**

The planet Mercury orbits the sun at a fast paced 47.87 km/s. After subtracting Earth's velocity of 29.78km per second we have a speed difference of 18.09km per second. Although it would not be possible to live anywhere except on the poles due to high temperatures. At this speed you would be 0.057 seconds younger per year than if you stayed back on Earth.

Over a 100 year life time: 5.74 seconds

If you were then able to get a satellite such as the ISS to be built around Mercury (obviously with some very effective heat/radiation shielding) You could gain an additional 6km/s in orbital speed giving you a total of 53.87km/s and a difference of 24.09km per second compared to Earth.

Over a 100 year life time: 10.18 seconds

Please see Harnessing Time Dilation part 2 for improvements to this article and taking my thought experiment even further.

Workings, Assumptions, Limitations:

Seconds in a year: 60*60*24*365 = 31536000

Seconds in 100 years: 60*60*24*365*100 = 3153600000

Velocity may be more complicated for objects orbiting planets. (Any input from someone in the field would be much appreciated)

Time Dilation Time Travel

Living on the equator means that due to the Earths spin you get an additional 465.1 m/s of velocity vs sitting on the pole (This does not take into account any wobble on the Earth's axis). Compared to anyone sitting at the poles you would be 0.00004 seconds younger for each year that passes.

Over a 100 year life time: 4 milliseconds

Flying in a plane can get you speeds of up to 917 m/s when in one of the latest Boeing 747s. Unfortunately that speed is not constant as it takes time to take off and get to the cruising speed. At 917 m/s if you cruise for 10 hours, you would be 0.168 microseconds younger than if you stayed on the ground. If you somehow managed to get a plane to fly non stop (refuel in the air?) then over a 1 year period you would be 0.0001475 seconds younger compared to if you were left on the ground.

Over a 100 year life time: 14.75 milliseconds

If we also take into account that you are flying east around the equator then we get 917 m/s from the plane and 465.1 m/s of velocity from the rotating Earth. At 1382.1 m/s you would gain 0.000335133072 seconds vs you sitting at one of the poles.

Over a 100 year life time: 33.51 milliseconds

The ISS orbits the earth at 7706.6 m/s relative to the Earth's center. If you had the money (or some serious negotiating skills) and managed to live on board the ISS each year you would be 0.0104198349888 seconds younger than if you had stayed on the north pole.

Over a 100 year life time: 1.04 seconds

The planet Mercury orbits the sun at a fast paced 47.87 km/s. After subtracting Earth's velocity of 29.78km per second we have a speed difference of 18.09km per second. Although it would not be possible to live anywhere except on the poles due to high temperatures. At this speed you would be 0.057 seconds younger per year than if you stayed back on Earth.

Over a 100 year life time: 5.74 seconds

If you were then able to get a satellite such as the ISS to be built around Mercury (obviously with some very effective heat/radiation shielding) You could gain an additional 6km/s in orbital speed giving you a total of 53.87km/s and a difference of 24.09km per second compared to Earth.

Over a 100 year life time: 10.18 seconds

Please see Harnessing Time Dilation part 2 for improvements to this article and taking my thought experiment even further.

Workings, Assumptions, Limitations:

Seconds in a year: 60*60*24*365 = 31536000

Seconds in 100 years: 60*60*24*365*100 = 3153600000

Velocity may be more complicated for objects orbiting planets. (Any input from someone in the field would be much appreciated)

Time Dilation Time Travel

© 2005-2021 Craig Mayhew